Sunday, November 1, 2026
'Fatherland' A Review
Saturday, October 31, 2026
'Hokum' A Review
Friday, October 30, 2026
'Wicker' A Review
Wicker is a romantic fantasy film based on the short story The Wicker Husband set in the nebulous past about a solitary Fisherwoman(Olivia Colman) who commissions the local Basket Weaver(Peter Dinklage) to make her a husband. The Wicker Husband(Alexander Skarsgård) and the Fisherwoman fall in love and are the subject of derision and jealousy from the townspeople.
Colman, no surprise, is captivating. She brings emotion and vulnerability, and it has a comedic register she can work in(unlike last year's The Roses). She conveys and undeniable and relatable humanness. Skarsgård conversely is totally ethereal, otherworldly, but equally compelling and is similarly able to play with the humor with alacrity. They have great chemistry- romantically, comedically, and dramatically. By the end you're really rooting for them, probably one of the best pure romantic onscreen couples in recent memory. The supporting cast is wonderful, Dinklage of course is a stand out, and the other notable performer is Elizabeth Debicki who plays the mean girl heavy, providing needed contrast, tension and stakes but also a character(in opposition to Colman) that has real interiority. The entire cast just totally understand the tone and the intent, all giving deliciously layered performances to a purpose.
Visually the film is rich and evocative, it feels like a fairy tale but also never loses the reality of its place or people. The costuming is superb and whatever combination of cloths, prosthetics, and CG make up the Wicker Husband is stunningly effective. It just looks great, it has a scale and impact the belies its limited budget. But it's really the script and the themes its able to get across in such a simple and entertaining way that's the most impressive about it. It has something to say, about gender roles, marriage, inclusion and belonging, the whole gambit, and does so with such a gentle and undeniable preceision.
Thematically rich, tonally intricate, with two great lead performances whose romance will sweep you away.
Currently in theaters.
Don't Miss It.
Tuesday, October 27, 2026
'You Can See Everything' A Review
Oppenheim as a stylist soars here, his visual development compounds with each project, and his fascination with perverse and illicit subjects continues. That is to say the film looks amazing, the framing and patience of the shots, the truncated aspect ratio, the languorous but unrelenting pacing, the close-ups. It all serves to evoke an eerie discomfort and put the audience in the room.
Fielder is a comedian and not a documentarian and his presence is both engaging and at times fumbling. He questions Holmes and her husband directly but a lot of the conversations get diverted into semantics. There's some situational comedy and a couple moments where Fielder attempts to explain comedy to them which is amusing. Fielder is a great foil through which to see the infamous Holmes and allows the film, by nature, to be more free-form and experimental.
It clearly aspires to get at greater themes of Truth but mostly fails, Holmes and her husband are clearly hustlers, this is apparent immediately. Holmes is a criminal and her husband is clearly aspiring to be one, even if we were to believe her semantic cartwheels her "belief" as she puts it is not relevant to her fraud charges and conviction. Not to mention, regardless of any of the particulars, it is also clear both Holmes and her husband are deeply mentally unwell. The fascination from both Fielder and Oppenheim comes across in some ways as privileged(these are not particularly unique subjects, they are hustlers and narcissists and sick people, the scope of Theranos downfall and the media attention are the only reason they are known) and they are unable to draw any meaningful conclusions from the project as a whole.
Unquestionably entertaining and beautiful looking, it feints at potent insights and teases discoveries but ultimately fails to deliver on the ecstatic. It seems to unnecessarily litigate two obvious truths- liars lie, hurt people hurt people.
Currently in theaters.
Rent It.
Monday, October 26, 2026
'The Last First: Winter K2' A Review
Saturday, October 24, 2026
'Wildwood' A Review
Wednesday, October 21, 2026
'Norm: The Tale Of Norm MacDonald' A Reivew
Saturday, October 17, 2026
'Street Fighter' A Review
Friday, October 16, 2026
'Sacrifice' A Review
Sunday, October 11, 2026
'Digger' A Review
Saturday, October 3, 2026
'Primetime' A Review
Pattison gives a big expressionistic performance, full of quirks and ticks and complete with an eerie imitation vocally. It's fun to watch no question. The supporting cast are equally intriguing- Merritt Wever as a producer is great, Phoebe Bridgers as one of the show's decoy's is amazing, Anna Faris and Alex Winter in what are basically cameos, and Eric Rahill brings some desperately needed levity. But the pitch perfect casting doesn't really come to anything because there seems to be no point to the any of it. A story about gross people doing gross stuff to other gross people. No matter how good the actors are, given the script, the task to make something compelling out of it is impossible.
Writer/director Lance Oppenheim's first narrative feature shows a lot of promise and deploys his unique, saturated, psychedelic inspired visuals and he gets incredible performances out his cast but like Spermworld the result seems only to revel in how compromised the situation and people are rather than making any broader statements or tapping into any larger themes(which he did successfully in Some Kind of Heaven and Ren Faire). So the result is something that is something that is excellent in regards to craft but almost meaningless as far as content. It comes across as particularly thin in the wake of 2025's much more incisive Predators.
Inspired acting and captivating visuals wrap a narrative that has no purpose, empty calories.
Currently in theaters.
Stream It.
Friday, October 2, 2026
'The History Of Concrete' A Review
Fans of Wilson's show will certainly be pleased with this but beyond that the appeal is doubtful. There's no focus, it's not actually about concrete, Wilson as a personality has the kind of Brooklyn hipster irony and apathy that has limited appeal(whether this be more comedy than documentary or vice versa). He even injects his difficulty making the film into the film in, what comes across as, a kind of petulant entitlement. Beyond a certain subset of older Gen Z, younger Gen Y, and New Yorkers this has little to nothing to offer.
Sprawling subject matter and uneven cringe comedic beats makes the movie basically an overlong, poorly paced version of Wilson's show.
A doc that purports to be about something but ultimately has nothing to say, a vague curiosity.
Currently in theaters.
Stream It.
Thursday, October 1, 2026
'Mother Mary' A Review
Coel is incredible here- poised, present, and captivating. An absolute star. She's able to bring coherence and relatable emotion to an abstract and occasionally pretentious script. Hathaway is miscast. Whether her inclusion was more of a business decision to secure funding or she was simply not the first choice she really struggles in the role. She looks awkward in the pop star costuming, she looks clumsy in the choreography, and she's just generally not believable as a Gaga or Madonna stand-in.
Writer/director David Lowery has a sumptuous visual style and that is fully on display here, even on a limited budget the movie looks fantastic but he falls prey to the issues that have plagued his work on-and-off since the beginning, this proclivity for narrative vagueness and an artistic pretention that renders a lot of his film's somewhat inert.
Worth a watch for the visuals and Coel but don't expect coherence.
Currently streaming on HBO Max.
Stream It.









