Sunday, November 28, 2021

'tick, tick...BOOM!' A Review

tick, tick...BOOM! is an autobiographical musical written by Jonathan Larson starring a fictionalized version of himself, the movie directed by Lin-Manuel Miranda, is based on the stage musical of the same name. In the early 90's Jonathan(Andrew Garfield) is an aspiring musical theater composer, workshopping a project, working at a diner, and self-destructing his relationship. A workshop performance of Jonathan performing the titular musical is used on and off as a narration device adding to the(ineffective, insufferable) meta-meta element.

Garfield is commendably committed, he and the cast are all saccharinely sincere in a very authentic if bafflingly dated 90's musical theater way. They are all competent, with some decent musical and dance talent but no one particularly wows. What is most startling is the white self-absorbed entitlement of Jonathan the character, the mythologizing of the narcissistic "committed" "starving artist". There are countless times in the movie where characters tell Jonathan how great and talented he is which is somewhat difficult to buy given what we see on top of the fact he's very clearly a selfish asshole. Is this an inherent flaw of the source material or a deficiency in Garfield's performance, its unclear.

Much like Miranda's other 2021 offering In The Heights the material is dated, doesn't hold up, and in this instance begs the questions why now but more importantly who cares. It is well performed but the music has the kind of generic musical theater sound that Miranda himself moved beyond with Hamilton. Ultimately this may simply come down to taste, to me, it is soup to nuts confusing and unengaging.

Appealing perhaps to the Gen X musical theater crowd but most likely offers little to none beyond that small demographic.

Currently streaming on Netflix.

Don't See It.

Saturday, November 27, 2021

'Ghostbusters: Afterlife' A Review

Ghostbusters: Afterlife is a supernatural dramedy, a sequel to 1989's Ghostbusters II that also functions as a soft reboot of the franchise foregoing the unfairly critically maligned hard reboot Ghostbusters of 2016. The movie opens on Egon Spengler(body doubled/CGI'd in a posthumous appearance by Harold Ramis) who battles an unseen spirit in rural Oklahoma. Cut to his estranged daughter Callie(Carrie Coon) and her two kids, Trevor(Finn Wolfhand) and Phoebe(Mckenna Grace), being evicted from their apartment. They travel to the rural farmhouse which they've inherited only to discover there was more to their reclusive father/grandfather than they thought.

Wolfhand and Grace are the real focus of the movie and are up for that responsibility. Both give incredibly grounded, committed performances, with emotional arcs, humor, and charm while still maintaining their youthful credibility. It's a fine tight rope to walk but both do it with surprising grace. And this focus is very refreshing and necessary for this kind of nostalgia based sequel/reboot. It is clearly a Ghostbusters movie but it is far enough removed and unique to feel different, a distinction many of these types of 80s/90s franchise continuations seem to miss. Phoebe's friend Podcast played by Logan Kim and Trevor's love interest/friend Lucky played by Celeste O'Connor also contribute to this revitalizing quality. Coon is decent but not given much to do, the same with Paul Rudd the kids teacher and Callie's love interest. But that's OK, even correct.

Tonally a bit more straightforward than the original movies, more emotional and less overtly comedic, but it works and just further serves to differentiate it successfully. Visually crisp and evocative, effective but not overly done CGI, much of action blessedly in the day time so it can actually be seen. An eerie transportive score and enough homage/references/echoes to the originals to feel connected but not beholden. Towards the end of the movie it does veer into a bit of transparent nostalgia mining but even that has one highly impactful element. Overall the rocky ending is forgivable.

One of the few successful, fun, maybe even fresh nostalgia properties resurrected for the 21st century.

Currently in theaters, coming soon to VOD.

See It.

Wednesday, November 24, 2021

S.A.D.

overcast
frosty air
gloom descends
winter's scare

hunker down
pack the freezer
plug the drafts
busy beaver

good humor
recedes a fraction
the price of
holidays distraction

Saturday, November 20, 2021

'The Power Of The Dog' A Review

The Power Of The Dog is a western, based on a novel of the same name, about volatile rancher Phil(Benedict Cumberbatch). Phil is domineering, repressed, narcissistic and anti-social and takes offense when his brother George(Jesse Plemons) takes up with a widow in a neighboring town Rose(Kirsten Dunst). Rose's son Peter(Kodi Smit-McPhee) is waifish and bookish and as a result is the recipient of Phil's ire until the two seem to connect, perhaps as a result of ulterior motives.

Cumberbatch puts in considerable effort which is commendable, and he's unquestionably talented, but he is horribly miscast here. His accent is a bizarre flat mid-Atlantic which doesn't match with the genre or setting, his posture is ramrod straight and although he clearly learned many skills for the role(braiding, banjo, riding etc.) they are all performed with a robotic repetitiveness that more clearly evokes the Terminator rather than a human cowboy. And the story seems to call for his character being intimidating or scary and that is simply not born out in the performance. Plemons and Dunst don't have much to do which is a shame but what they have to do doesn't land near much reality. Dunst's character particularly turns into a simpering, melodramatic caricature of an alcoholic seemingly in the span of weeks which doesn't work and is baffling. Not a fault of her's more the script. And Smit-Phee has some interesting moments but he's mostly sidelined until the third act. Much of the tension between the characters seems a result of their simple inability to communicate which is not particularly sympathetic or cinematic. All in all, despite the talent, it just doesn't work, none of the characters have much dimension or reality and as a result there's nothing to really hook into or care about.

Beautifully shot, evocative score, authentic costuming all make for a great production. But the narrative, either by virtue of the adaptation or the source material itself, is bloated. There's too many threads that don't come together and as a result of their number no single one is properly developed. There is so much hinted at, feinted at, but never actually addressed. And one of the major knots of the story is Phil who is, perhaps closeted or the survivor of sexual abuse or some combination of both, but this isn't given proper attention and that aside it doesn't have nearly the compassion, focus, or truth in this regard as Brokeback Mountain which came out sixteen years ago. Not that there can't be more than one gay cowboy movie with different takes, there absolutely can, but if you're going to do it, do it. So on many levels it all begs the question, what's the point?

Talent in front of and behind the camera fail to come together. More award season signaling than compelling narrative.

Currently in theaters streaming on Netflix 12/1.

Stream It.

Friday, November 19, 2021

'Eternals' A Review

Eternals is a superhero movie, the latest in the MCU saga. A race of aliens known as Celestials are the creators of the universe, their efforts to foster life are opposed by Deviants, the Celestials enlist Eternals(a group of superpowered humanoids) to fight the Deviants on planets where life has not sufficiently developed to do it. Earth has been protected by a group of ten Eternals since 5000 BC. This is their story!

A mostly impeccable cast is squandered mainly because it is simply too big. Kumail Nanjiani, Brian Tyree Henry, Lauren Ridloff, Barry Keoghan, Don Lee, Salma Hayek, and Angelina Jolie are all given little to nothing to do and given virtually no screen time in which to not do it. You have a wide dearth of talent there with varying strengths- comedic, action, drama- but none are given a chance to exert any of their not inconsiderable talent. The movie is stuffed with so much overly complicated and unnecessary plot and exposition it allows no character to differentiate themselves in anyway. They look different and have individual names and powers thankfully because that's the only way to tell who is who. The two defacto leads Gemma Chan and Richard Madden come across as flat and uncompelling, as result of performance, script, or direction it's hard to tell. Regardless it all kind of categorically doesn't work.

Director/co-writer Chloé Zhao has here a virtually impossible task, not only because of the number of characters that have to be introduced and the amount of story the bloated run time has to cover but, presumably, having to do so under the gaze and restriction of the MCU brass. The result is simply too many characters, too much plot, not enough time. Eternals is easily two or three movies worth of content and because of that, it's not unwatchable it simply has no depth as far as character and emotion and not much of a pay off as far as thrill.

Meandering and mostly toothless despite the considerable talent behind it.

Currently in theaters coming soon to Disney+ and VOD.

Stream It.

Thursday, November 18, 2021

India House

We went to India House
for the first time in 1997
for my mom's birthday
it was one of the first
(if not the first)
Indian restaurants in Rockford
It was the first time I had crispy poppadoms
the first time I had tangy chutney
the first time I had fluffy naan
samosas, tandoori, curry
ghee, aloo, paneer
vindaloo, masala, kofta
mustard seeds, fennel, turmeric
a cornucopic, transcendent, cascade of spice and flavor.

At first, tentative
I picked and nibbled
then revelatory, ravenous, I devoured
broken, battered, decimated
lay my pre-teen fidelity
to Hot Pockets and frozen pizza
revealed was my naiveté 
my narrowminded prescriptive palette
and from this ecstatic epiphany of a meal
grew a hunger to taste it all
a willingness to try 
when before it was only reticence, only fear
there gestated a courage, culinary and otherwise
to, at the very least, be open
to the possibility of the new, the unknown.

Tuesday, November 16, 2021

Mrs. A And The Amazing Technicolor Sound System

Mrs. A was head of the dance department, such as it was, at my high school and did most of the advanced level teaching. I never had her for dance, had her for this one-off class called CAPA Internship which I'll get into. My freshman year dance teacher and my favorite of all time was Ms. Conley, coincidently the sister of Ms. Johnson my middle school dance teacher who I also really liked. She was great but she didn't stay on, I don't think the school had the budget for a third full time dance teacher so goodbye Ms. Conley. I had Ms. Krishmanya(lot of people just called her Ms. Krish) sophomore year and again junior year by some stroke of scheduling luck. Senior year when I knew I couldn't dodge the Mrs. A bullet I took my PE waiver for playing soccer, something I had never bothered to do previously because although I'd never say it to my friends who weren't in CAPA(which stood for Creative And Performing Arts, the arts program in our district) I liked dance quite a bit and I was, if not necessarily good, at least surprisingly passable at it.

Mrs. A had a dominating type of presence and Ms. Krish wasn't a push over exactly, great dancer/choreographer, good teacher, but never very assertive so she took a back seat most of the time, at least when I was there. Mrs. A was the kind of person who wanted to be the friend of her students as well as their teacher. I never gossiped with her but I know people who did and I overheard her a couple times pumping kids for info. She was also the kind of person who wanted to appear to be in charge, appear to be doing new and innovative things, without necessarily having the follow through or willingness to do the actual work. You could tell the intent of some of her "close" relationships with some of the more talented students was that she was betting some day they'd get notoriety or fame and cite her as inspiration. I don't know how she was as a dancer or dance teacher(I imagine relatively good) but I can tell you she was, generally, low grade mean. So I avoided her as much as I could, when the spring dance concert would come around I made a point to always go through Ms. Krish if there were any issues. 

Senior year I signed up for this new class that sounded cool, CAPA Internship, where we would be paired with local artists to get some real world experience. Come to find out on the first day of class this was Mrs. A's idea, she was the teacher, and that's what it mostly was, an idea. It was just a fuck around class, Mrs. A talked a big game but she had zero actual internships lined up for the 15 or so kids that were in the class and after the shine of having launched a new class wore off she mostly checked out. She was "too busy". It was still fun and to be fair we did do some interesting stuff and she did eventually connect like three students with gigs. I got to do one day at the local NPR affiliate and go on air to do a newspaper reading for the deaf where I had to spell out Mendota(a town in Wisconsin) cause I froze up and didn't know how to pronounce it, on the whole it was honestly thrilling. Actually for the most part Mrs. A was kinda nice and chummy in the class. So hey maybe I was wrong about her. Or maybe being on the inside of her circle was just better than being on the outside of it.

Second semester senior year she had negotiated with the two theater teachers Mr. Sleger and Mr. Harnish to direct the spring musical Joseph. I never got cast in the musicals, my friend Joey was the triple threat and usually(and justly) got the leads, and I had just played Creon in Antigone the winter play which was a pretty big part so I wasn't sure if I was even going to audition. Mrs. A called me up to her office a week or so before the auditions, which was very odd as we never had the like check-in lets-chat type of relationship, and asked me if I would be the stage manager. I was never very good at or very interested in the tech side of things and my gut reaction was I didn't want to do it. Standing in her office as she sat at her desk the vibe felt wrong and I had heard enough stories about working with her that I knew it would be a challenge at best and extremely difficult at worst. But I'd never been an SM and one of the things Sleger(the teacher I was closest with and learned the most from) always taught, with his actions and his words, is that you should know how to do it all(at least a little bit) and that the techies were just as important as the actors(his specialty was set design, he encouraged the tech kids to do acting stuff too). So I figured it might be a good learning experience but the kicker was it felt like I couldn't say no. Standing there in front of Mrs. A behind her desk next to the Martha Graham mural with Ms. Krish teaching a class outside with the thump of students grand jeteing across the floor, it felt like I couldn't say no. It was a formality, it felt like Mrs. A was doing me the courtesy of asking even though she could absolutely make me. So I said yes. And that was my mistake.

For the most part the process wasn't terrible but it became clear Mrs. A wanted less a stage manager and more a secretary, a lackey, a yes man. Which, not really my thing, but I'd signed up, I'd committed- I'd play the part. It became clear Mrs. A was the type of woman who liked to have boys or young men under her thumb. To control. In a way that you couldn't exactly say was abusive but that you could absolutely say was unpleasant. There's a kind of cold unobtrusive cruelty some women have towards boys, usually as a result of having been abused by men themselves, that I recognized in Mrs. A because I was intimately familiar with it from some women in my extended family. I knew it so I tried to roll with it, the show was finite, I just had to get through it.

If that's all it would have been, the small stuff, the subtle stuff I couldn't identify until years later in therapy, it would have been if not by any definition fun at least negligible. But one big issue popped up the week of the show during tech(that part of rehearsal where you integrate the lights, music, and costumes etc.) which was - the sound system.

The theater had a pair of kinda old, kinda cheap speakers, it wasn't an issue for any other performance because the plays didn't have music and every other musical used the school band or orchestra. Mrs. A ditched the student musicians in favor of an instrumental recording. So at our first tech rehearsal, I'm in the booth working the soundboard, my buddy Hans(a great actor as well as lighting designer) was working the lightboard, Mrs. A decides that the speakers are shit and gets her doof of a husband to bring in her stereo speakers from home which they couldn't run to the front of the theater(where the regular speakers were) so they put them on top of the booth which was at the very back of the house. Immediately we start having issues. If the sound is turned up high enough for the actors to actually hear their back up its deafening to the audience, if its at a good level for the audience the actors can't hear it well enough to sing to it, and me in the booth controlling the volume can't gage it because the sound is emanating right above my head. Mrs. A doesn't agree that there's an issue, her speakers and her set up are perfect and just what she wanted. So we open.

First act of the first show I set the volume at what I think is a good volume, probably low for the actors but appropriate for the audience. Fifteen minutes in or so Mrs. A comes in and tells me to crank it, I say no problem, I'm a yes man. At the intermission I get knocks on the booth door, multiple people coming by to tell me the music is too loud they can't hear the singing, some nice about it, some not so nice, I'm getting frazzled, I know they are correct, I say no problem. Start of the second act I turn it back down, couple minutes in Mrs. A comes in says what's the deal with the sound, turn it up, I say people complained, she says I don't care, I turn it back up. I get a couple knocks during the second act and then after the show I get a couple return customers just to chew me out.

After notes to the cast I convey all this to Mrs. A, her attitude is like it's my problem to solve, that she's put upon, exasperated, irritated I even brought it up, I suggest going back to the old sound system, she refuses, she says, concedingly like she's doing me a big favor, that she'll ask Sleger for a monitor for the stage. 

Next night, next show, we don't know if the monitor works, we go through the same song and dance. I set it low, Mrs. A comes in says high, I get complaints, down, then back up again. I get very frazzled and start feeling really bad. After, Mrs. A is pissed, like why am I fucking with the sound, why am I fucking with her show, and I'm like I'm honestly just doing my best. Her response is disappointment and veiled disgust. I'm fucking wrecked. She marks the sound board for the level she wants and tells me to suck it up and ignore anyone who complains and to without equivocation keep the sound at that level. This feels profoundly wrong to me but I can't quit, there's only one show left and a lot of my friends are in it, and on some level I knew what I signed up for. Standing in front of her desk next to Martha Graham's frozen swan leap and the thundering of the tour jete's I knew then on some level this had the potential of being one bad rodeo for yours truly. But I’d said yes. So I figured- take your fucking lumps Steve-o. 

Last night it is ol' Mrs. A's show. I made signs that I put on the booth door that said "Do Not Disturb". I set the volume at the prescribed mark and I let it roll. And it was, without question, too loud. The show was not great. But afterwards Mrs. A is fucking beaming and giving me an I-told-you-so, I-am-vindicated look, holding two dozen roses from her grinning husband and his glistening veneers, giving a speech after the curtain call all performative humility and masked rapture at the attention. It was lunatic. I got the hell out of there and it was done. I survived, good riddance.

The whole circus taught me one, profound, simple lesson. "No" is an option most of the time. If someone asks you to do something- work related, creatively, socially, a favor, what have you- "no" is on the table. I grew up being taught that you said yes to things, you helped out, you pitched in, you did your part, which is great, for the most part its served me well. But there are people who will take advantage of that quality, people in positions of authority need to earn trust and respect, there are situations its better not to be involved in. I needed a couple reminders after that but I got the message eventually, it was a lesson hard earned.

Sunday, November 14, 2021

'Love Hard' A Review

Love Hard is a holiday romcom about a LA based modern dating columnist Natalie(Nina Dobrev) who starts a digital relationship with upstate New York man Josh(Jimmy O. Yang). When she flies across the country to surprise him for Christmas she discovers he wasn't using his actual photos and is not who he pretended to be.

Dobrev and Yang don't have much chemistry but to be fair the script doesn't allow them much in the way of space in which to develop it. Dobrev is a bit stiff but passable, Yang is more comfortable and has more facility particularly with the comedy but he too can't get much going. The two have a couple really fun moments that send-up/riff on Christmas movie classics that really work which just brings into stark contrast how much of the movie doesn't. The supporting cast is uneven, Josh's parents and grandma and Heather McMahan as Natalie's friend are all great, but most everyone else is forgettable.

Netflix seems to be attempting to give the Hallmark channel a run for it's money in churning out holiday pictures with a focus on quantity over quality. And although there is a lot of promise and potential in Love Hard it falls victim to this churn.

Numbing, predictable, with a dash of pleasantness.

Currently streaming on Netflix.

Don't See It.

Saturday, November 13, 2021

'Red Notice' A Review

Red Notice is an action/comedy one part National Treasure ripoff, one part Ocean's 11 wannabe. The movie opens on a title sequences explaining the "history" of Cleopatra's three eggs, priceless antiquities. Flashforward to the present and FBI profiler John Hartley(Dwayne Johnson) is on the trail of international thief Nolan Booth(Ryan Reynolds) who's attempting to collect all three. They soon find themselves on the same side and in opposition to another international thief The Bishop(Gal Gadot) in, you guessed it, a race against time!

Johnson and Reynolds bring their considerable charm and humor to bear, and they are clearly having fun(who wouldn't given the globe-trotting locales), but they aren't able to inject much vitality into the derivative DOA script. It's nice to see Gadot trying her hand at this kind of genre, going for a performance with some significant humor, but she doesn't seem particularly comfortable or confident in it and as a result the performance is pretty stilted.

The production is competent if starkly unremarkable. It all feels very cookie cutter, very stock footage, very check list, and this extends to the script. It's as if a think tank or algorithm created it, it has all the components to be a good popcorn flick(charismatic stars- check, wise cracking- check, elaborate heist sequences- check) but the result couldn't be more lifeless and pedantic.

Netflix has produced some incredibly thoughtful/effective small to mid budget dramas and comedies but its attempts at breaking into the "blockbuster" arena has failed and with Red Notice continues to abjectly.

Currently streaming on Netflix.

Don't See It.

Friday, November 12, 2021

'Last Night In Soho' A Review

Last Night In Soho is a horror/thriller about Ellie(Thomasin McKenzie), a naïve aspiring fashion designer that is struggling with mental illness and/or some supernatural ability, moves to London to go to arts school. Her roommate Jocasta(Synnøve Karlsen) is, inexplicably, a caricature alpha 90's mean girl and forces Ellie to seek other accommodations. She rents a room(how can she possibly afford it) which when she sleeps in it transports her back to swinging 60's London, the period she's obsessed with and nostalgic for. In these sequences she inhabits the body of Sandie(Anya Taylor-Joy) an aspiring singer who gets taken advantage of by Jack(Matt Smith). 

McKenzie and Taylor-Joy are both fine actors but are woefully underutilized and let down by a script that has an overly complicated plot, underbaked characters, and failed genre melding. McKenzie gives it her all but the resulting character is a thin, weak, meek, confusing mess. Taylor-Joy is little more than furniture and isn't allowed to any dimension what so ever she is simply the object of protracted abuse. The support cast all function as plot devices and not particularly effectively. Why cast such talented actors if they're little more than pieces on a board?

Co-writer/director Edgar Wright is unarguably an excellent, even inpsired craftsman, there are some striking sequences where Ellie mirrors(literally and figuratively) Sandie and the two swap and swap again, the lighting is stylized and effective, the costumes excellent, the soundtrack transportive. The production across the board, truly top notch. But its rendered virtually pointless by the incoherence of the plotting, the offensive, protracted, and unnecessary use of sexual violence and the threat of sexual violence, bizarre puritanical perspective on sex work, sophomoric implausible rendering of the lead character, on and on.

Although not the most egregious error one that is particularly striking is how undefined the nature of the flashbacks are. Is Ellie dreaming? Is she in the midst of a mental breakdown? Does she posses some supernatural ability? If so what is the nature of it? The reality of what these sequences actually are is never clarified, which may have been OK, but then the visions escalate and begin to encroach on Ellie's reality having real world physical effects. If we are supposed to buy into any of that reality, so that the story has actual stakes, it has to have some definition which is absolutely does not.

An immaculate production fails to elevate a disappointing, juvenile, offensive narrative.

Currently in theaters and available to rent on VOD.

Don't See It.

Thursday, November 11, 2021

Something Lurking

Something creeping, crawling, mincing
something petty, minute, minor
a breath on the neck
a trace on the back
a shadow in the periphery
an echo of hostility
not rage nor terror
nothing big, identifiable
but hidden, shuttered
disquiet
yet to be discovered.

Tuesday, November 9, 2021

'The Harder They Fall' A Review

The Harder They Fall is a western about Nat Love(Jonathan Majors) quest for revenge against Rufus Buck(Idris Elba) after the latter killed the formers parents when he was a child. The movie opens on that scene, then flashes forward to Nat, now with a gang of his own, and the impending jail break of Rufus, with the inevitable confrontation looming.

The large ensemble cast is profoundly stuffed with talent- Elba, Majors, Zazie Beetz, Regina King, Delroy Lindo, Lakeith Stanfield, Edi Gathegi, RJ Cuyler, Danielle Deadwyler- on and on. Unfortunately due to uneven pacing, a lack of narrative focus, and a shockingly encroaching soundtrack none of the actors have much of an opportunity to develop any dimension in the way of character. It is a joy simply to see them all in the same movie but it also underscores the disappointment.

First time writer/director musician Jeymes Samuel has a wonderful, transcendent even, idea but his music video back ground is apparent in every scene and not in a good way. The soundtrack is a bizarre mish-mash of modern styles and genres interspersed with some(quite effective) diegetic songs and some significantly less effective non-diegetic period ones. Of the almost two and half hour runtime there is probably less than ten minutes that doesn't have a blaring song to accompany it rigidly telegraphing and subsequently undercutting anything the narrative is trying to do. It is beyond distracting, at times the mix of the background track is so loud it is impossible to actually hear the dialogue of the characters. This along with Samuel's penchant for numerous involved cuts with little to no motivation- long overhead shots, long zooms, smash cuts- it is again, very distracting. It is clear Samuel has talent, no question, but either his music video background or lack of feature film experience comes across as a lack of restraint and as a result there is too much going on and it overshadows the good work the actors are most certainly doing.

Stellar cast eclipsed by over done post-production.

Currently streaming on Netflix.

Stream It.

Wednesday, November 3, 2021

Midwestern Hospitality

We may not have the manners
of our Southern fellows
but there is no monopoly
on regional welcome
hearty are our meals
conversation, direct and simple
silence, a comfortable companion
kindness, restrained but instant
working people, guileless people
who'd give you the coat off their back
and stop to help you change a flat
who say what they mean
and mean what they say.
A people who, when trouble comes, they stay.